People in a quiet Stockport village 'feel cheated' and are moving away because there's nothing there for them, councillors have claimed.

The comments were made at a Bramhall area committee meeting in Stockport last week where two planning applications for nearly 1,000 new homes in and around Woodford were considered. Both have faced opposition amid concerns about the green belt.

One application put forward by Barratt Homes and David Wilson Homes wants to develop land on Upper Swineseye Farm and build potentially 455 homes of which 50% would be affordable. Stockport council officers recommended the plans are rejected.

However JAG Woodford Ltd and Russell LDP's plans for land south of Chester Road were recommended for approval by officers. If given the go ahead, this could see 423 houses built alongside up to 72 apartments for those aged over 55, and a 72-bed care home.

However, councillors ultimately decided to recommend their planning committee colleagues reject both applications put forward. During a debate on the Chester Road application, Liberal Democrat councillor Jeremy Meal said there were frustrations in the village over promises made by developers that have still not materialised.

Referring to a new school in the village proposed as part of a previously approved development, he said: "I think, rightly, residents feel cheated in Woodford when ultimate control of the school expansion is out of direct council control, because basically this has all been promised before."

He said parents were now 'having to ferry children to more distant schools' causing more traffic and congestion. He also criticised the planting of 'non-natural' trees in the Woodford Garden Village which he described as 'very sterile' and 'plastic sort of from the garden centre type plantings'.

Conservative councillor Peter Crossen also questioned whether the properties would be affordable for those who need them and the promises to invest in local services and infrastructure.

Download our Nub News App!

- It’s FREE and available now
- Breaking news notifications
- Your Town in Your Pocket

Describing people in the village as 'once bitten, twice shy', he said: "I do not believe we should be confusing aspirations with guarantees, particularly when those aspirations are being used primarily and in the face of residents as a reason to justify permanent development on this land."

He added: "Living in Woodford, I see many houses up for sale at the moment. Many houses of neighbours of mine that have moved in, stayed there for a year to two years and realised that the infrastructure is not there to support them and their family.

"They were promised schools, they were promised NHS care, they were promised health centres, they were promised all sorts that weren't delivered but I am sure planners set out with the best of intentions to deliver them originally, but they have just not happened."

Gary Lynch, speaking on behalf of Russell LDP, said they had 'put forward a high quality and sustainable development that responds positively to its surroundings', adding: "The result is a landscape-led master plan that celebrates and protects established trees, field boundaries and ponds, whilst providing an extensive new nature park framed around recreation and ecological enhancement and is accessible to the wider community."

He said they had taken on board concerns, improvements would be made to local bus routes, housing shortfalls in Stockport addressed, and support for a new health centre and day nursery. The development also includes a care home.

Officers had recommended the plans for approval. A report said: "Whilst noting the adverse impacts of the proposed development in relation to harm to the green belt, loss of dwellings and impact on heritage assets, there would be a considerable number of benefits over a much wider range of considerations."

Councillors will make a final decision on both planning applications at a later date.